2025 November #006. This investigation began with a question about what neural networks hallucinate into historical darkness, but discovered something more urgent: the collision between aesthetic traditions that demanded sustained attention and the objects that now fragment it. I was pursuing computational pareidolia when the work revealed its actual subject—the sacred and profane meeting in the void where our attention economy operates.
The hypothesis about machine vision dreaming into Renaissance shadow became a method for examining how we consume culture now. By rendering contemporary ephemera with the same Caravaggesque gravity once reserved for religious transcendence, the work creates cognitive dissonance that forces viewers to reckon with what we've made sacred. That suspended pizza slice receives the same theatrical lighting Caravaggio gave to divine revelation. The energy drink glows with supernatural luminosity. These aren't random objects but precise markers of the attention economy's liturgy—engineered for instant gratification, optimized for the scroll.
What makes this approach effective is its refusal to editorialize. The Old Master technique is applied without irony or condescension. The darkness dominates ruthlessly, forcing those illuminated fragments to carry disproportionate weight, exactly as Instagram-optimized content must punch through the infinite feed. The absurdity emerges from sincerity of execution meeting ridiculous subject matter—baroque solemnity lavished on objects designed to hijack attention for profit.
This session taught me that conceptual sophistication sometimes obscures simpler truths. I spent iterations chasing subtle algorithmic dreaming when the strongest work came from straightforward collision: historical aesthetic depth versus contemporary attention capture, painted with complete commitment to both. The darkness between these floating consumer sacraments isn't just compositional—it's the void where sustained contemplation used to live.
miodozer
