TIME EVOLUTION COLLECTION: Beeple and TIME magazine collaborate for two live auctions on SuperRare

TIME EVOLUTION COLLECTION: Beeple and TIME magazine collaborate for two live auctions on SuperRare

TIME EVOLUTION COLLECTION: Beeple and TIME magazine collaborate for two live auctions on SuperRare

4 years ago

TIME Magazine has announced an exciting auction on SuperRare highlighting two important pieces from their archives: TIME’s first issue from 1923 and a more recent cover by an individual who’s been at the forefront of the digital art movement for more than a decade, artist Mike Winklemann (aka Beeple).

The highest bidder for the first issue of NFT, which can be found here, will also receive a physical copy of the issue, which does not exist outside of museums, libraries and a few private collections. 

The winner of the Beeple Cover NFT, which can be found here, will also get the physical piece seen in the NFT as part of the purchase too. The red is in homage to TIME’s “Red Border.”

With nearly 100 years between the covers, these auctions are running simultaneously now and will continue through this Friday, May 21st, with the first issue auction ending at 9PM EST on Thursday and the Beeple piece auction ending at 9AM EST on Friday.

On the TIME first issue

The auction of TIME’s first issue, originally printed in 1923 and sold for 15 cents, comes with a copy of the actual near century old issue.

“In 1923, two young entrepreneurs launched a publication that would disrupt their industry and come to define and in many ways help shape the century to come,” said Edward Felsenthal, Editor-in-Chief & CEO of TIME.

“What I love about TIME’s first cover is the craftsmanship used to create it – a lithographic crayon portrait and hand-drawn line work,” said D.W. Pine, Creative Director of TIME. “As TIME has shown for nearly half a century, history can be made within its iconic border whether the cover subject is rendered in oil or acrylic, photograph or line drawing, 3D render or cut paper or sculpture. The variety of presentation matches the variety of subjects.”

The portrait itself is of then-Speaker of the House Joseph Cannon and was created by artist William Oberhardt two years earlier as a commission for the government. It came to be so widely loved that it was selected to be placed on the top of the 1939 World’s Fair Time Capsule.

“Today, what began as a print magazine mailed to 9,000 subscribers reaches a global audience of more than 100 million across multiple mediums,” Felsenthal said.

On the TIME Beeple issue

“For our May 10th / 17th 2021 issue, artist Mike Winkelmann (aka Beeple) wanted to take our readers inside his “canvas” to depict the stratospheric acceleration of the digitization of our world by creating an image that focused on his artistic process,” Pine said. “The cover image depicts his actual computer interface mid design, complete with a wireframe render of a figure interacting on the left and a more complete version on right.”

The artwork was developed using Cinema 4D and OctaneRender software that is powered by nearly a dozen Nvidia graphics cards.

“People have been creating digital artwork for the last 20 years and it has just as much craft, message, intent, as anything made on a canvas and has just as much ability to affect people emotionally and intellectually,” Beeple said. “It has been exciting through NFTs to see people start to realize the value of this type of work and I think we’re just at the beginning of the next chapter of art history.”

15

Luke Whyte

Luke Whyte is SuperRare's Editorial Director.

Art

Tech

Curators' Choice

The GameStop phenomenon was nothing new: 5 questions with Barrons magazine as they mint their first NFTs

The GameStop phenomenon was nothing new: 5 questions with Barrons magazine as they mint their first NFTs

The GameStop phenomenon was nothing new: 5 questions with Barrons magazine as they mint their first NFTs

4 years ago

In celebration of their 100 year anniversary, Barron’s is minting their first and centennial covers on SuperRare. In light of this event, we sat down with Mae Cheng, Senior Vice President of Barron’s Group, to discuss what lies ahead for Barron’s and what the past can teach us about investing in the future.

Can you tell me a little about what Barron’s has been doing in celebration of the 100 year anniversary? I read that you’d paid a freelance historian to read through every issue.

We’re really proud of the Barron’s 100 year legacy and I’m personally grateful for all the brilliant people that have contributed to making us the essential financial resource for news and analysis. Nonetheless, we’re looking to the future and some of the things we’ve got lined up to mark this anniversary will show that. 

For example, in celebration of our centennial we launched the Barron’s Future Focus Stock Index, which tracks 138 companies that are positioned for leadership growth and innovation. Right now it’s at the top of our website and, if you have the time to take a look, you’ll see how cool it is and how it surpasses the S&P over the course of time. 

We also launched a new product we’ve called Barron’s advisor. It’s a premium membership offering that’s targeted towards the financial advisor audience set to equip them with tools, insights and analysis. It’s designed specifically to elevate their practices. 

And then to your point, yes, since the start of the year we have had a freelance journalist/historian, Ken Pringle, go through our archives to write about highlights from Barron’s past coverage and make that tie to how it resonates today. For example, he wrote about how the GameStop phenomenon and the investor squeeze play is not actually something new. Early on in Barron’s, I think in 1923, there was a supermarket called Piggly Wiggly that was being sold short by a number of Wall Street bank investment firms. According to what Ken dug up from Barron’s archives, some people viewed this at the time as the big guys getting rich off of the little guys. So investors put the squeeze on the shorts and, there we go, like a hundred years before, it’s history repeating itself. 

Ken also made the connection in one of the pieces that he published for us earlier this year about how the railroads are the equivalent to the internet today. So, it was the railroads at the turn of the century that connected people and commerce and that process really created fortunes for a lot of people. So Barron’s, at that time, wrote a lot about railroads because it really dominated the economy of the nineteenth century. And that’s not too different from what we’re doing today in Barron’s with the internet and the technology that relies on that connectivity. For me it’s this really insightful journalism – really being able to connect the dots in a way that makes sense to people and gives you that ‘aha!’ moment – that is what is uniquely Barron’s and what has made us so valuable over the past century.

As far as you are aware, has the core mission of the publication changed dramatically since 1921, or has Barrons remained focused around the same goals and values?

I think our core values really have remained the same and those are to provide our readers at every stage of their financial journey with fact-based, unbiased financial reporting and analysis to help them make informed financial decisions in their lives. This is something that doesn’t change from one decade to another. It still resonates. It resonated when Clarence Barron started the publication a hundred years ago and it resonates today. As I was saying before, I think we have a really good pulse on the insights that we need to deliver to our audience and, because of that, this mission never gets old.

Can you talk a little about this project with SuperRare, what Barron’s intends to mint on the platform and why?

Yeah, we minted our anniversary cover. It came out last weekend. I think it’s really beautiful. It feels like a work of art and doesn’t look dated. One of the things about turning one hundred is that you don’t want to look like you’re one hundred and I don’t think we look like we’re one hundred with that cover at all. So, we minted that cover and we’re also minting our very first cover. We’re really excited about that too. 

As we celebrate our centennial anniversary, we want to mark this historic moment digitally and mint something that really speaks to our brand. For the last hundred years Barron’s has delivered really forward-looking, actionable insights that have helped our readers make financial decisions and helped them navigate new markets. This digital art and collectibles space is really a whole new frontier for all of us, so I think it makes sense for us to be part of this experience.

During one of our chats last week, someone alluded to the idea that Barron’s is focusing some energy on informing, and appealing to, a new, younger generation of investors. Can you talk a little bit about what this strategy entails and how this project with SuperRare folds into it?

That’s a really great question. I think there is a new, younger generation of investors who are interested in the market. I think it’s a lot more accessible to younger folks now than it was when I was in my twenties. So, because there is an expressed interest from these audiences, and because this is a space that Barron’s knows really well, we believe the information and analysis we offer is applicable to investors at every stage of their financial journey.

Just a couple of examples, we have a thriving Barron’s education program and, as part of that program, we work with financial advisors and their alma maters to bring Barron’s on to college campuses. We’re also ramping up a collection for young audiences on our website with content that we feel is really of interest to this demographic and providing tools that might help educate and guide them like our MarketWatch virtual stock exchange. Throughout the site we have no shortage of coverage on areas like Dogecoin, Ether, Elon Musk, electric vehicles, the growing cannabis industry and personal finance. I think all of these are content areas that really resonate with younger audiences. 

What we’re doing is serving the investor audience and I think the investor audience is growing as younger folks get into the market. So it makes sense of us to expand our offerings for them.

Cryptocurrencies, NFTs, DAOs and decentralized blockchain networks: these are new, often confusing, often volatile technologies and investment opportunities. How does Barron’s, a publication known for providing smart and clear investment insights to its readers, approach understanding and reporting on such a dynamic, rapidly evolving new environment?

I think you’re right: It is super dynamic and moving fast. Some of these issues are just so complex. But I’m really proud to say that at Barron’s our reporters and our editors are breaking these issues down with a lot of thought and a lot of expertise, and are providing actionable insights to really educate the readers on all these emerging opportunities. They work just as deftly at understanding Dogecoin and NFTs as they do at breaking down the sociopolitical ramifications of the pandemic and how that’s influenced global markets. 

Our newsroom is, I’m proud to say, filled with some of the most dedicated and smartest journalists around. From one day to another they are able to examine these very complex issues and, not only analyze them, but draw connections among them and explain them in a way that we can all understand to help us make sound financial decisions. 

This goes back to something I said earlier about our mission, a mission that has resonated over the decades and across generations. It’s why I have no doubt that Barron’s will be around for many more generations to come.

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

15

Luke Whyte

Luke Whyte is SuperRare's Editorial Director.

Art

Tech

Curators' Choice

Cornælhuys: A CryptoArt project 500 years in the making

Cornælhuys: A CryptoArt project 500 years in the making

Above: “data privacy” by stockcatalog licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0

Cornælhuys: A CryptoArt project 500 years in the making

4 years ago

With his collection, Cornælhuys, pop surreal artist Jæn has created a work in progress. Or, perhaps, it is more appropriate to say he’s created a bridge between the past, the present and the future.

Cornælhuys is a series of 18 “one of one” animated paintings Jæn made of 16th century masks. Minted on SuperRare, they are at once unsettling yet welcoming, the latest chapter in a story that begins in the 16th century and, Jæn hopes, will remain unfinished until long after we’re all dead.

Passed through the centuries

The story of Cornælhuys begins around 1514 with the birth of Cornelis Floris II in the Belgian city of Antwerp. Believed to have trained under his father, a stonemason specializing in tombstones, Floris would grow to become one of the most sought after sculptors of his time and place.

Eerie and captivating, the “Floris style” was rooted in the Grotesque, a 16th century phenomenon that, unlike the Renaissance style known for balanced and beautiful proportions, skewed instead toward the disproportionate, the fantastic and the delirious. He built tombs for Baltic patrons like the King of Denmark and the Duke of East Prussia and, at dates unknown, sculpted a series of haunting stone masks that would come to be the basis for the Cornælhuys NFTs.

The problem, however, is that all of the masks are gone. In fact, none of Floris’ sculptures survived the test of time. It’s possible we would know nothing of them at all if it weren’t for the work of a little known Netherlandish draftsman, Frans Huys, who made etchings of the masks in the late 16th century for other sculptors’ use.

Two of Frans Huys illustrations of Cornelis Floris II’s sculptures, Rijks Museum

Luckily, these etchings made it into the hands of the Rijks Museum in the Netherlands. They made high-resolution scans which Jæn first stumbled upon last October.

Putting 16th century sculptures on the blockchain

Jæn fell in love with the masks.

“They reminded me of some research I had done on Pan / Dionysos / Bacchus,” he said.

“I collected the scans,” Jæn said. “I cleaned them a lot but tried to keep the grainy texture. And then I made them move a little and brought them to life.”

Jæn’s minted renditions of the same two masks, Cornælhuys 4/18 – Fertile Féroce and Cornælhuys 2/18 – Homme-Pistil, left to right

The result is a series of captivating digital works with an intriguing connection to the past.

“I wanted it to feel like (the masks) are really floating in digital space,” Jæn said. “It is interesting to take something that should be the decor and make it the main piece.”

Jæn’s vision is for Cornælhuys to be just a chapter in the story of the masks, just the most recent iteration in the lives of evolving artworks. Hopefully, preserved digitally, he said, a future artist will write the next chapter, creating something new and relevant to the technology and vision of their time.

“This project is about conservation,” he said, “but not just for the sake of it. It is a project in three parts: First, taking the past and bringing it to the present and, second, I want another artist to be able to find this and turn it into something new.”

“(This work) is a blockchain made of art and time,” he said.

But digital preservation ain’t easy

There is a sense in some circles that once a work is minted on a blockchain, it is forever preserved. This, however, isn’t exactly the case: The token is preserved, along with related transactions, but the file itself – the actual digital work – is stored singularly on an IPFS node. These nodes can be cloned by anyone, but storage is expensive and, most times, the files generally live only on the original node, which is paid for by the marketplace hosting the node, like SuperRare or Foundation. 

The larger issue of decentralized network file storage is one the greater blockchain community working to solve, but we’re not there yet.

With this in mind, Jæn is working with Tara Digital Collective and employing the best practices outlined in their NFT conservation toolkit, to assure the preservation of Cornælhuys long into the future.

“We seek to bring museum-grade conservation to works that are minted on the blockchain,” said Sarah Maryam Moosvi a Digital Media Strategist with Tara Digital Collective.

“The root of the issue is that the blockchain is not built for visual media,” she said. “It is prohibitively expensive to upload files of any size to the network.”

The Tara Digital Collective’s NFT conservation toolkit aims to help artists and collectors solve this problems with techniques and strategies for long term archival of digital assets.

“We provide a collector package that is delivered to a collector on collecting the work,” Moosvi said, “We’ve created a toolkit that is given to these artists and the responsibility of the gallery is to put together that package, maintain those files and preserve the work.”

“Because this is just the beginning (of CryptoArt), we are nowhere near having a long lasting solution for preservation of digital art on a blockchain.” she said. “We have a situation of trust: trust between artist, collector and gallery. (The toolkit) is about having a conversation about how we handle this art, which I think is quite healthy.”

Assuming Cornælhuys does survive the test of time, there’s no real way of knowing what the next iteration of its life could be. But Jæn has some thoughts.

“As far as I am concerned, we are at the very beginning of the metaverse and digital identity,” he said. “One of the best ways to store information is through DNA. Right now this is very speculative but just imagine if at some point we could create a genetic artwork. I would love for (the masks) to continue on in that way: through something living.”

15

Luke Whyte

Luke Whyte is SuperRare's Editorial Director.

Art

Tech

Curators' Choice

Discussing freedom and photography with punk pioneer Patti Smith and artist Steven Sebring

Discussing freedom and photography with punk pioneer Patti Smith and artist Steven Sebring

Discussing freedom and photography with punk pioneer Patti Smith and artist Steven Sebring

4 years ago

When it became evident during a Zoom call that patti punk – a single edition animated portrait of punk pioneer Patti Smith by artist Steven Sebring – would be minted on SuperRare in the same week as Christie’s CryptoPunks NFT auction, one well-intentioned party pitched an idea: Perhaps patti punk could be positioned in contrast to the Christie’s auction as a representation of, “the essence of a true punk”?

Immediately Sebring started to laugh. At the time, he was seated shoulder to shoulder with Patti as to both fit through a cell phone camera lens and, inadvertently, to provide Smith’s cat, Cairo, with double the lap space to sleep on.

“Let me stop you right there,” Smith said. “I started working with (Steven) in ‘95, which, obviously, was past the heyday of the punk movement.”

patti punk, 1 of 1, Steven Sebring

In ’95, Smith was just tiptoeing back into public life and many photographers she worked with were just aiming to recreate Robert Mapplethrope’s iconic portraits of her from the ‘70s, she said, like the portrait on the cover of her 1975 album, Horses.

“(Steven) just let me be myself, which to me was always the basic concept of what punk rock was,” she said. “(In the ‘70s), I had all of this energy and ideas about rock and roll and I wanted to transform. That’s what an artist does. Steven has never asked me once to go back to look like I did. He just lets me feel freedom.”

patti punk reflects this relationship: Sebring has transformed a Polaroid portrait from the late ‘90s that captured a pioneering artist in transition into an animated artwork to be sold through a transformative technology.

But first, some backstory

When Sebring met Smith in 1995, he’d never seen the “Godmother of Punk” perform. He hadn’t lived in 1970s New York during the poverty and the prolificacy of punk’s infancy. He didn’t read poetry at the Chelsea Hotel with the likes of Ginsberg and Burroughs. He hadn’t seen Smith’s foot go through an amplifier, at least yet.

When Steven met Patti, she was a widow living in Detroit, raising two children on a dwindling budget.

“I left public life in 1979,” Smith said. “My last concert was to 85,000 people in Florence, Italy and then, the next day, I walked away.”

In 1980 she married Fred “Sonic” Smith, guitarist for influential Detroit rock band MC5, and they moved to the suburbs of Detroit.

“I didn’t really intend to come back,” she said. “I intended to be a writer and a mother.”

But then, in 1994, Fred passed away, followed soon by Smith’s brother. 

Suddenly, “I really needed to find a more lucrative way to make a living, to take care of my children,” she said.

One option was to re-enter public life and to perform but, after so many years away? After such grief?

“It was daunting at first,” Smith said. And she was particularly uncomfortable about being photographed.

“I had almost a horror and sorrow of getting my picture taken,” she said, “because (in the past) Robert (Mapplethrope) would have been the one that I would have been working with.”

Mapplethrope, who had been a close friend and longtime collaborator, passed away in 1989.

“So, I asked Michael Stipe (of R.E.M.),” she said, “‘do you know a photographer who won’t come at me too aggressively like some rock and roll asshole, and will understand that, you know, I’m a widow with children?’ And he suggested Steven.”

“Steven was a young guy that didn’t know anything about me, and that was great because he had no preconception,” Smith said. “I could just be myself at that time of my life and also find who I was.”

“I was rediscovering myself through his lens,” she said.

In the 25 years that have passed since then, Smith and Sebring have grown close.

“We’ve done a lot of collaborating,” Sebring said. “We’re collaborating to this day, almost everyday.”

“An improvisational quilt that took 10 years to make”

Sebring, an Emmy-nominated director and self proclaimed “Photo-Scientist”, rose up through the world of fashion photography before pushing into filmmaking and digital portraiture. In NYC, his Sebring Revolution Media Lab experiments with three and four dimensional techniques to create interactive experiences.

“It’s real down rabbit hole stuff,” he said.

Nonetheless, at the root of his work, Sebring says, lies a bond with his subjects.

“It’s the most important thing,” he said. “If you don’t have a connection, you’re not going to get a good moment, you know? It’s all about trust and feeling it’s the right time.”

It was with this attitude that he first approached Smith back in 1995.

“When Patti and I met in Detroit she had to remind me to take a picture,” he said. “Most of the time I was just getting to know her. It was lovely. I shot some film and that was it. But I knew immediately that, you know, there was something special about this one.”

In 1996, Smith performed at Irving Plaza in New York. It was the first time Sebring had seen her live.

“And he was like, ‘that’s the same person that was folding laundry the whole time while we were talking in Detroit?’” Smith said.

Sebring proposed they work together on a film, a project that would unfold organically over 10 years, culminating in the release of Patti Smith: Dream of Life, winner of the “Excellence in Cinematography Award: Documentary” at Sundance in 2008.

“We did everything piecemeal,” Smith said of the film, “because I didn’t have any money at the time. He was just coming up. I was struggling. And the film that we used, sometimes it was 16 millimeters. Sometimes it was black and white. Sometimes it was semi-expired. (The project) was like a quilt, you know? An improvisational quilt that took 10 years to make.”

“We were exploring,” she said. “I learned a lot through that film.”

Enter patti punk

It was while working on Patti Smith: Dream of Life that, in 1999, Sebring shot a series of Polaroids for Smith’s Gung Ho album that would eventually become the single edition NFT, patti punk, being auctioned this week on SuperRare.

“I pixelated those (Polaroids) in 2005,” Sebring said. “So (the NFT) originates from individual polaroids – one-off polaroids.”

“I was really excited when scanners came around because I could scan an original Polaroid and reproduce it,” Sebring said. “And then I started getting into, you know, screwing up the images as far as making them interesting and pixelating them.”

It was Patti who first saw the pixelated portraits’ parallels with stained glass.

“It’s like beautiful stained glass windows when you’re up close to them,” Sebring said. “You don’t know what you’re seeing, but then you step away and the image comes to life.”

The essence of true punk

At the start of our Zoom call, after hearing Smith’s response to being labeled the “essence of true punk”, I had a question.

How could “punk” as a term – similar to “hippy”, “nerd” or even “millennial” – remain true to its origins as it aged and calcified around a series of agreed upon ideas and labels? Labels like leather jackets or spiked hair that are commandeered by consumerism and placed in advertisements so we can sell culture back to ourselves? Could punk live on as a paradox? In juxtaposition to itself?

“Well, first of all, I think that each generation translates for themselves,” she said. “They translate what rock and roll means to them, what punk rock means to them. Our culture is very appropriative. It’s fluctuant. And I stepped back because I believe that new generations should redefine what all of these genres mean. And if little kids want to dress up like punk rockers for Halloween and all, you know, I think it’s all great. Obviously there’s going to be iconic images that people identify with punk rock, and I think that’s fine.”

“I’m simply saying that the essence of punk rock is freedom,” she said.

15

Luke Whyte

Luke Whyte is SuperRare's Editorial Director.

Art

Tech

Curators' Choice

My goal is to make digital portraiture the next evolution of portraiture: a conversation with Ian Spriggs

My goal is to make digital portraiture the next evolution of portraiture: a conversation with Ian Spriggs

Above: “data privacy” by stockcatalog licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0

My goal is to make digital portraiture the next evolution of portraiture: a conversation with Ian Spriggs

4 years ago

Seven years ago, Ian Spriggs left his job and set off on a journey. Working as a character designer, he was always under deadline, cranking out work that was interesting but, he felt, often fell short on quality.

“So, I took some time off and decided to see how far I could push it,” he said.

And by “push it”, Spriggs meant, push forward the genre of digital portraiture – a pursuit at which he has been very successful.

Ocean, 1 of 1

“In 2014, there were a lot of digital humans out there but most of them felt like they were about technical achievements like, ‘look at our digital human, look at how realistic they’re becoming’”, he said. “But they didn’t, in my opinion, feel believable because they weren’t trying to capture the human emotion. They were just trying to capture the human realism.”

So, Spriggs set off to do something different. Beginning with self portraiture, he began experimenting with techniques to elevate the medium of digital portraiture.

Marie, 1 of 1

“The way I approached it is I looked back at the Rembrandts and the Caravaggios – all the masters of art history – to see what they’ve done with their work and how it feels alive centuries later,” he said. “I’ve got to somehow capture that human emotion into the digital human. And so my primary intention was not to make a realistic digital human but to try and make a digital portrait which is a representation of the human essence.”

“My goal is to make digital portraiture the next evolution of portraiture”, he said. And, certainly, his work reflects that – combining digital techniques like sculpting and texturing with techniques learned from study of the greats that came before.

Self portrait, 2020

It starts with a relationship to the subject

Spriggs work begins with his relationship to the subject.

“If you see my work as a collection it is like all the parts of my life, like all the people in them are my friends and family,” Spriggs said. “So as a collection it is almost like an autobiography of my life, of who I am.”

You can capture the likeness of someone just by drawing them, he said, “but it’s not really a portrait because they don’t really know who that person is. I’m trying to show you not only likeness but actually show you in depth of who that person is.”

“It’s kind of like a book cover,” he said. “I’m trying to show you everything in that book through the image on the cover.”

Erica, 2020

Creating the artwork

“Once I’ve picked my subject, I’ll do a photoshoot with them,” Spriggs said. “I’ll take about a thousand photographs from different angles. It’s almost like I take a scan of them, but I do it manually.”

Once he has a 360 scan of the subject through photos, Spriggs uses Maya to block out the cameras, Mudbox for sculpting and texturing and V-Ray for Maya for rendering the lighting. Finally, he’ll use photoshop, “for any color changes or something like that,” he said.

The results are genre-pushing works of art that he’s now bringing into the NFT space.

Tony, 2018

Moving into the NFT space

“It’s an absolutely great thing that has happened,” he said of NFTs for artists. “I think creating an NFT is actually giving value to a digital artwork. Before NFTs, everything was just a copy of a copy of a copy – duplicated a hundred times until everything gets diluted.”

It’s important though, he said, that as humanity moves further and further into this digital space – through NFTs or otherwise – that we not lose track of our humanity.

“It’s so easy to hide behind avatars,” he said. “That’s why with my work, my portraits are real people. They are real emotions I’m conveying. I try to bring it back down to earth but, also, to head into that direction of what’s possible while maintaining that human aspect of it.”

15

Luke Whyte

Luke Whyte is SuperRare's Editorial Director.

Art

Tech

Curators' Choice